About Madrona
Madrona Portfolio
Contact, Jobs and more
Philosophy Team What's New
Madrona Venture Group
Madrona Venture Group, a venture captial firm located in Seattle, Washington

HTML5 vs. Native Apps – digital media companies leading the charge back to the browser

by Scott Jacobson

In the last couple of days, two notable digital media services released HTML5 applications optimized for iPad that provide a native app-like experience while bypassing Apple’s app store.

Yesterday, VUDU launched a browser-based, streaming video service, optimized for iPad. Today, Amazon launched Kindle Cloud Drive, enabling customers to buy, download and read Kindle books, also through an HTML5, browser-based experience.

There are already plenty of good reviews of these apps (see here and here), and I won’t re-hash all of the ground that has been covered. The two things that most impressed me about the Kindle app are:

1.) The buying experience is great – although the store is missing a couple of key features (e.g., personalized recommendations), I found browsing and buying through this app better than on Amazon’s website and far better than the store on Kindle

2.) You can download and store books for offline reading – even though it is a browser-based application. This is one of the really nice benefits of HTML5 and makes browser-based applications feasible (and closer to parity with native apps)

It’s not at all surprising Amazon or VUDU launched these services. The iPad is primarily an entertainment device, and it’s a platform these companies need to be on. But the economic model fundamentally doesn’t work for services like Amazon and VUDU if they sell content through the app store and have to pay Apple’s 30% cut.

I can already stream MP3s from Amazon’s Cloud Player to my iPad. I suspect it won’t be long before the Amazon MP3 team delivers its own iPad-optimized, HTML5 integrated store and player that delivers an iTunes-like experience. And I bet Amazon Instant Video isn’t far behind. I think we’ll see its iPad-optimized HTML5 app right around when Amazon’s Android tablet launches, which will undoubtedly have a native Instant Video application.

It’s fun to see some signs of early momentum on the iPad/HTML5 front, and it’s not at all surprising that digital media services are leading the charge. Unlike the iOS game companies, whose content COGS is $0, digital media services like Amazon and VUDU have to pay publishers/studios/labels for the content. So HTML5 is really the only viable long-term approach to build a business on the iOS platform.

In short order, I expect we’ll see a host of other digital media services executing the HTML5 strategy for iOS. Is this a sign of things to come for other app categories on iPad/iPhone?

Tags: , , , ,

2 Responses to “HTML5 vs. Native Apps – digital media companies leading the charge back to the browser”

  1. Jason Thibeault Says:

    Living in the video space, I saw HTML 5 explode into the industry (largely because the most tactile feature of HTML 5 was the video tag). And then HTML 5 applications starting coming out. I’ve done a lot of thinking and writing about HTML vs. native apps but it wasn’t until Amazon’s announcement that I really swung into the web-app camp. My ultimate argument was regarding the “contained experience” that apps promised. You could control every part of the UI/UE. Not true with a website tweaked for mobile. But Amazon has shown that you can create a contained app experience in the browser that mimic much the same functionality as a native app. And given that Kindle Cloud has local storage, there’s not much reason to build a native app if there’s no need to interact with core device functionality (like a camera). I think this portends some very interesting ramifications for all appstores. If lots of developers miffed by the Apple terms change follow Amazon’s suit, there could be a host of apps falling out of the app store. Will the next “app store” actually be a mobile website? Will someone develop middleware that hooks to the browser SDKs and enables some sort of bridge to core device capabilities? This is not just about media/entertainment companies adopting HTML 5 over native. It’s a “opening of the door of possibilities” that could portend a radical shake up in the dominance or walled-garden approach of apps.

    http://blog.jasonthibeault.com/index.php/2011/08/10/review-hands-on-with-amazons-kindle-cloud/

    http://blog.jasonthibeault.com/index.php/2011/08/10/a-sign-of-things-to-come-for-mobile-apps-apples-appstore/

  2. Tony Mandarano Says:

    HTML5 makes a lot of sense for applications which are specifically designed for the tablets (which is essentially just the iPad). In fact, HTML5 is also great for iPhone applications. However, you really start to run into UX and UI issues on Android because the large variations in screen resolution.

    I’ve also experienced that the current tools (such as Sencha + Phonegap) give you a finished product that is about 80% the UX quality of a native app. In my opinion it is not worth sacrificing a higher quality UX to save in development costs and increased portability.

    Source: personal experience building PaidPunch app.

    By the way, hope you’re doing well Scott.

Post a Comment



We welcome your comments, however all comments are moderated. Offensive or off-topic comments will be deleted and not displayed. Also, please note that comments are owned by the commenter and do not necessarily reflect the views of Madrona Venture Group or its portfolio companies.


LP Login